On Mon, 2009-06-01 at 11:45 +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote: > Le lundi 01 juin 2009 à 10:35 +0100, Ben Hutchings a écrit : > > Unfortunately no-one involved in g-p-m ever specified exactly what the > > kernel bug is or was that they believed was responsible. I am as much > > in the dark as you are. > > So am I. HAL frontends such as g-p-m are entirely dependent on what the > kernel exposes for all their functionality, and to us maintainers it is > just a black box. Right, but I really don't see how the kernel could have caused this particular bug unless g-p-m relied on battery identification, since otherwise the kernel just shows what batteries with which charges are connected. johannes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part