Your message dated Sun, 19 Apr 2009 18:40:15 +0100 with message-id <1240162815.6949.8.camel@deadeye.i.decadent.org.uk> and subject line Re: Bug#524740: firmware-nonfree: debian/copyright file seems to be outdated has caused the Debian Bug report #524740, regarding firmware-nonfree: debian/copyright file seems to be outdated to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 524740: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=524740 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: firmware-nonfree: debian/copyright file seems to be outdated
- From: "Francesco Poli \(t1000\)" <frx@firenze.linux.it>
- Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 16:56:42 +0200
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20090419145642.9592.71445.reportbug@homebrew>
Package: firmware-nonfree Version: 0.15 Severity: important Hi! Let me first thank you for maintaining this package in non-free, and for moving Linux-kernel-shipped non-free firmware blobs from the Linux kernel package to it. IMHO, this is really the Right Thing™ to do, as it abides by the Debian SC, keeps Debian (main) untainted by those non-free firmware files, while making it easy to install them whenever a user needs them for his/her hardware. OK, that said, it seems to me that the debian/copyright file is now outdated: it lacks a number of licenses for some recently added firmware files (such as ATI Rage 128 and Radeon ones, Matrox G20/G400/G550 ones, and so forth, added in version 0.15). Please update the debian/copyright file, so that it reflects the current content of the package. Thanks in advance.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: 524740-done@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Bug#524740: firmware-nonfree: debian/copyright file seems to be outdated
- From: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
- Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 18:40:15 +0100
- Message-id: <1240162815.6949.8.camel@deadeye.i.decadent.org.uk>
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20090419145642.9592.71445.reportbug@homebrew>
- References: <[🔎] 20090419145642.9592.71445.reportbug@homebrew>
On Sun, 2009-04-19 at 16:56 +0200, Francesco Poli (t1000) wrote: > Package: firmware-nonfree > Version: 0.15 > Severity: important > > Hi! > > Let me first thank you for maintaining this package in non-free, > and for moving Linux-kernel-shipped non-free firmware blobs from > the Linux kernel package to it. > IMHO, this is really the Right Thing™ to do, as it abides by > the Debian SC, keeps Debian (main) untainted by those non-free > firmware files, while making it easy to install them whenever a user > needs them for his/her hardware. > > OK, that said, it seems to me that the debian/copyright file is > now outdated: it lacks a number of licenses for some recently > added firmware files (such as ATI Rage 128 and Radeon ones, > Matrox G20/G400/G550 ones, and so forth, added in version 0.15). > > Please update the debian/copyright file, so that it reflects the > current content of the package. > Thanks in advance. Policy requires a copyright file in each binary package, not in the source package. debian/copyright is the conventional source for this file but is not required. The copyright/licence texts for binary packages are actually taken from the corresponding directories in the source package. Ben.Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--- End Message ---