Bug#503544: ath5k: after suspend to RAM, requires cold boot to work again
On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 9:21 AM, maximilian attems <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
>> I have to say I really don't appreciate the style of bug management
>> where I file a bug, there is no response for months on end, and then I
>> get a request to try a newer version. It gives the impression that
>> you're not actually doing anything about the bugs.
> ath5k was quite young on 2.6.26 so it was somehow expected to fail there.
I would have appreciated being told that within a few days of
reporting the bug; it would have been useful information then.
> also you didn't seem to provide any updates
I provided all the information I had in the initial bug report. I
would have responded to requests for further information if asked, but
no one asked.
> nor did you go upstream.
I don't have the slightest idea how to report a bug to the kernel
upstream. Isn't forwarding bugs to upstream part of a Debian