Bug#522095: kernel build fails, because zlib.h is missing

To: "maximilian attems" <max@stro.at>
Cc: 522095@bugs.debian.org, 514048@bugs.debian.org, dannf@debian.org
Subject: Bug#522095: kernel build fails, because zlib.h is missing
From: "W. Martin Borgert" <debacle@debian.org>
Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2009 17:48:53 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 20090401174853.19192w3or9phclid@webmail.in-berlin.de>
Reply-to: "W. Martin Borgert" <debacle@debian.org>, 522095@bugs.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20090401121937.GU27571@stro.at>
References: <20090331191834.GA17400@wavehammer.waldi.eu.org> <20090331202256.19007aduk4k4zj40@webmail.in-berlin.de> <handler.522095.D522095.123852711817126.notifdone@bugs.debian.org> <20090331215039.940847wujgip8cun@webmail.in-berlin.de> <[🔎] 20090401121937.GU27571@stro.at>

Quoting "maximilian attems" <max@stro.at>:

On Tue, 31 Mar 2009, W. Martin Borgert wrote:

I wonder, whether it would be OK to let linux-source-2.6.29 recommend
zlib1g-dev, like propposed by Dann on 2009-02-03?

...

no.


Thanks for the elaborate answer. What is solution to the problem, if
it's neither adding the recommend to the linux source package nor to
kernel-package?

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Bug#522095: kernel build fails, because zlib.h is missing
  - From: maximilian attems <max@stro.at>

References:
- Bug#522095: closed by Bastian Blank <waldi@debian.org> (Re: Bug#522095: kernel build fails, because zlib.h is missing)
  - From: maximilian attems <max@stro.at>

Prev by Date: Bug#522095: closed by Bastian Blank <waldi@debian.org> (Re: Bug#522095: kernel build fails, because zlib.h is missing)
Next by Date: Bug#522095: kernel build fails, because zlib.h is missing
Previous by thread: Bug#522095: closed by Bastian Blank <waldi@debian.org> (Re: Bug#522095: kernel build fails, because zlib.h is missing)
Next by thread: Bug#522095: kernel build fails, because zlib.h is missing
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread