Bug#521268: closed by maximilian attems <max@stro.at> (Re: Bug#521268: linux-headers-2.6.29-1-amd64 cannot be installed because of linux-kbuild-2.6.29 absence)
Have I understood you correctly: your say that broken package issue
made no sense already?
[15:22 /tmp]$ LANG=C aptitude install linux-headers-2.6.29-1-amd64
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
Reading extended state information
Initializing package states... Done
Reading task descriptions... Done
The following packages are BROKEN:
linux-headers-2.6.29-1-amd64
The following NEW packages will be installed:
linux-headers-2.6.29-1-common{a}
0 packages upgraded, 2 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
Need to get 3934kB of archives. After unpacking 25.1MB will be used.
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
linux-headers-2.6.29-1-amd64: Depends: linux-kbuild-2.6.29 which is
a virtual package.
The following actions will resolve these dependencies:
Keep the following packages at their current version:
linux-headers-2.6.29-1-amd64 [Not Installed]
Score is -9881
Accept this solution? [Y/n/q/?]
The package is BROKEN. Aptitude says that. Are you pretty sure that
this is not a bug?
Have a nice day,
Nikolay.
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 14:54, maximilian attems <max@stro.at> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 02:49:40PM +0300, Nikolay Panov wrote:
>> > right thus please stop reopening new bugs on same issue.
>>
>> Well, this is same issue, but not the same bug. This bug is about
>> another package (linux-headers-2.6.29-1-amd64, not
>> linux-headers-2.6.28-1-amd64) which cannot be installed due to
>> dependency on another package (linux-kbuild-2.6.29, not
>> linux-kbuild-2.6.28) absence.
>> So, I believe, this bug should be tracked separately from #516734.
>
> also the old bug made no sense already, so not many bananas
> for such input.
>
Reply to: