Re: Problem with CIFS on Lenny?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
Ben Hutchings schrieb:
> On Fri, 2009-02-13 at 14:12 +0100, Harald Krammer wrote:
> [...]
>> Hello Ben,
>> I did my network configuration with the Debian installer, selected DHCP
>> and nothing more.
>>
>> hk@hkpc:~$ ps axu | grep -i network
>> root 3073 0.0 0.0 12972 2084 ? Ssl 07:45 0:00
>> /usr/sbin/NetworkManager --pid-file
>> /var/run/NetworkManager/NetworkManager.pid
>> root 3081 0.0 0.0 3504 1324 ? Ss 07:45 0:00
>> /usr/sbin/NetworkManagerDispatcher --pid-file
>> /var/run/NetworkManager/NetworkManagerDispatcher.pid
>>
>> Here is my /etc/network/interfaces :
>> # The loopback network interface
>> auto lo
>> iface lo inet loopback
>>
>> # The primary network interface
>> allow-hotplug eth0
>> iface eth0 inet dhcp
>
> That means that eth0 is managed by NetworkManager and not ifupdown. You
> should change "allow-hotplug eth0" to "auto eth0".
> See /usr/share/doc/network-manager/README.Debian for more details.
>
> Ben.
>
Hello Ben,
sure it will work on my workstation, but other users will use the
NetworkManager (rather default configuration) together with CIFS/NFS
shares and the problem appears again.
The shut down process runs following steps:
[...]
*) K14network-manger (stops nm, get eth0 down?)
*) K14network-manger-dispatcher (stops nm-dis)
[...]
*) S31umountnfs.sh Possible race when eth0 is already down?
Time-out messages from Kernel
*) S35networking 'ifdown -a only when no network fs is mounted
*) S36ifupdown Cleaning up ifupdown
*) SS40umountfs unmount fs
*) SS60umountroot unmount root fs
*) SS90halt bye bye
I think it's not a kernel related issue. I will look into step
K14network-manger to verify my suspicion.
Nice greetings,
Harald
- --
Harald Krammer
Brucknerstrasse 33
A - 4020 Linz
AUSTRIA
Mobil +43.(0) 664. 130 59 58
Mail: Harald.Krammer (at) hkr.at
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEAREIAAYFAkmWEjsACgkQ9QlAsubHO9sJqgCePVAjzr/4uj1ztqEOLHp4V3/x
c2oAnjoAqc4dnqCWIHyYlXAzKGqpP9Bn
=TCCJ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: