also sprach Bjørn Mork <bjorn@mork.no> [2008.12.09.1413 +0100]: > This should not apply against linux-2.6 2.6.26-11 since it is already a > part of debian/patches/bugfix/all/stable/2.6.26.4.patch. Are you sure > your patch really does apply? If it does, then I'd suggest trying > *just* edcfe5f7e307846e578fb88d69fa27051fded0ab instead. My patch does no "apply", it was made against 2.6.26-11 -- Supermicro just sent me their forcedeth.c and I made the patch. > BTW, I also noticed that linux-2.6 2.6.26-11 includes the patch > linux-2.6-2.6.26/debian/patches/features/all/net-use-gso.patch > which very well may trigger the problem. You might also want to > try building without that patch. I have not tried -11 on the server, only -8 and -10, which both had the problems. How do I find out when net-use-gso.patch was added? The changelog does not mention it, and I cannot find a repository for the source (there are also no Vcs-* links in the package). > But then again, there's your performance requirements. I guess > you'd better get a proper NIC :-) As soon as I get a second switch port, I will. While I only have one switch port, I have no choice... -- .''`. martin f. krafft <madduck@d.o> Related projects: : :' : proud Debian developer http://debiansystem.info `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~madduck http://vcs-pkg.org `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems
Attachment:
digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/)