[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#432468: does not resume from suspend-to-RAM on toshiba satellite m70



On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 5:57 PM, maximilian attems <max@stro.at> wrote:
> any update on ath5k with 2.6.25?

The chip in this laptop is:

# ath_info c0200000
 -==Device Information==-
MAC Version:  5213A (0x70)
MAC Revision: 5213A (0x78)
PHY Revision: 2112a (0x56)
 -==EEPROM Information==-
EEPROM Version:     5.2
EEPROM Size:        16K
Regulatory Domain:  0x64
 -==== Capabilities ====-
|  802.11a Support: no   |
|  802.11b Support: yes  |
|  802.11g Support: yes  |
|  RFKill  Support: yes  |
|  32KHz   Crystal: no   |
 ========================
GPIO registers: CR 00018000 DO 00000000 DI 00000017

which is not on the supported list at
http://madwifi.org/wiki/About/OpenHAL (there is something very similar
on the list, but you know how it is with wireless chips - that "A" at
the end could mean totally different internals).  I tried it anyway,
with
linux-image-2.6.25-1-686 v. 2.6.25-1.  The chip is recognized and an
interface created but it won't 'ifconfig up' or scan for APs.

May  8 20:20:29 boheme kernel: [   10.102600] ath5k_pci 0000:04:02.0:
registered as 'phy0'
May  8 20:20:29 boheme kernel: [   10.535239] ath5k phy0: Atheros
AR5213A chip found (MAC: 0x78, PHY: 0x45)
May  8 20:20:29 boheme kernel: [   10.535301] ath5k phy0: RF2112A 2GHz
radio found (0x56)
May  8 20:20:29 boheme kernel: [   11.115910] udev: renamed network
interface wlan0 to ath0
May  8 20:20:35 boheme kernel: [   22.744264] ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP):
ath0: link is not ready

In any case the Atheros drivers are irrelevant to the suspend problem,
because (as I said in the original bug report) the failure mode is
exactly the same if I do "echo mem > /sys/power/state" from an
init=/bin/sh boot.  In fact, I get the same failure if I do that from
inside the initramfs, before any modules are loaded at all
(break=top).  Again, 2.6.25-1.

Any chance of getting CONFIG_PM_TRACE turned on in Debian's kernel builds?

zw



Reply to: