Your message dated Fri, 2 May 2008 10:40:09 -0500 with message-id <20080502154008.GA12893@cat-in-the-hat.dnsalias.com> and subject line linux-modules-* fixes probably unnecessary has caused the Debian Bug report #418179, regarding module-assistant versioning inconsistent with linux-modules-*-2.6 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 418179: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=418179 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: individual module versions could be clearer
- From: Frank Gevaerts <frank@gevaerts.be>
- Date: Sat, 07 Apr 2007 19:36:07 +0200
- Message-id: <20070407173607.15133.19266.reportbug@hex.gevaerts.be>
Package: linux-modules-contrib-2.6 Severity: wishlist While the Version: field of module packages built from linux-modules-contrib-2.6 does contain the original version, this is not very clear. It would be useful if the Description: contains a line stating the upstream version. -- System Information: Debian Release: 4.0 APT prefers testing APT policy: (1000, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-1-686 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: 402811@bugs.debian.org, 408134-close@bugs.debian.org, 418179-close@bugs.debian.org, 475797-close@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: linux-modules-* fixes probably unnecessary
- From: Ken Bloom <kbloom@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 2 May 2008 10:40:09 -0500
- Message-id: <20080502154008.GA12893@cat-in-the-hat.dnsalias.com>
After consulting with Daniel Baumann <daniel@debian.org>, it appears that it's unnecessary for linux-modules-* to add an epoch or change its versioning scheme. modules-assistant still requires fixing, by adding an epoch to all modules it creates, and reversing the version number to match linux-modules-*'s scheme, however no coordination with linux-modules-* is necesary. I am closing the bugs againt linux-modules-*. --Ken -- Ken (Chanoch) Bloom. PhD candidate. Linguistic Cognition Laboratory. Department of Computer Science. Illinois Institute of Technology. http://www.iit.edu/~kbloom1/Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---