[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#497450: marked as done (resume no more work after s2disk (regression from 2.6.25-2))



Your message dated Mon, 1 Dec 2008 23:11:23 +0100
with message-id <20081201221123.GA16713@wavehammer.waldi.eu.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#497450: resume no more work after s2disk (regression from 2.6.25-2)
has caused the Debian Bug report #497450,
regarding resume no more work after s2disk (regression from 2.6.25-2)
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
497450: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=497450
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: linux-image-2.6.26-1-amd64
Version: 2.6.26-3
Severity: important

Hello Kernel team,

s2disk from uswsusp used to be very reliable with Debian kernel
2.6.25-2, but with 2.6.26-1, it fails consistently at resume.

The relevant part of the log from the resume session:

http://newpeople.debian.org/~ballombe/misc/log-2.6.26-1-amd64.txt

Cheers,
Bill.

-- Package-specific info:

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
  APT prefers stable
  APT policy: (500, 'stable'), (100, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.25-2-amd64
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

Versions of packages linux-image-2.6.26-1-amd64 depends on:
ii  debconf [debconf-2.0]        1.5.11etch2 Debian configuration management sy
ii  initramfs-tools [linux-initr 0.85i       tools for generating an initramfs
ii  module-init-tools            3.3-pre4-2  tools for managing Linux kernel mo

linux-image-2.6.26-1-amd64 recommends no packages.

-- debconf information excluded

-- 
Bill. <ballombe@debian.org>

Imagine a large red swirl here. 



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Mon, Dec 01, 2008 at 10:00:16PM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote:
> Yes it works fine with -10. You can close this report.

Closing.

Bastian

-- 
You're dead, Jim.
		-- McCoy, "Amok Time", stardate 3372.7


--- End Message ---

Reply to: