[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#406419: [powerpc, CHRP] 2.6 kernel does not boot on IBM RS/6000 43p 150



Hi Moritz,

>Does this error still occur with more recent kernel versions, e.g.
>with the Lenny d-i RC1?

With the d-i RC1 it's even worse on the console:

----------------- client boot log---------------------------
0 > boot net:192.168.22.51,vmlinuz-chrp.initrd,192.168.22.58 
BOOTP S = 1 
FILE: vmlinuz-chrp.initrd
Load Addr=0x4000 Max Size=0xbfc000 
FINAL Packet Count = 13774 
FINAL File Size = 7052236 bytes.

zImage starting: loaded at 0x00400000 (sp: 0x0121fea0)
Allocating 0x431e28 bytes for kernel ...
OF version = 'IBM,SPH00221'
gunzipping (0x01400000 <- 0x00407000:0x005c14cf)...done 0x3db000 bytes
Attached initrd image at 0x005c2000-0x00aa8b3d
initrd head: 0x1f8b0808

Linux/PowerPC load: 
Finalizing device tree... using OF tree (promptr=00c1b320)
OF stdout device is: /pci@fef00000/isa@b/serial@i3f8
command line: console=ttyS0,9600 console=tty0
memory layout at init:
  alloc_bottom : 01836000
  alloc_top    : 30000000
  alloc_top_hi : 40000000
  rmo_top      : 30000000
  ram_top      : 40000000
Looking for displays
found display   : /pci@fee00000/display@b, opening ... done
instantiating rtas at 0x2ffb5000 ... done
copying OF device tree ...
Building dt strings...
Building dt structure...
Device tree strings 0x01837000 -> 0x01837f15
Device tree struct  0x01838000 -> 0x0183d000
Calling quiesce ...
returning from prom_init
----------------- client boot log---------------------------

That's it. The command line seem to be valid (ttyS0), but it's opening a
display? Sounds strange to me. Unfortunately, I do not have a matching
monitor available anymore, so I can't see if something is displayed there.

I'll try the daily build next, If you like,

CU,
Uli
-- 
Dipl. Inf. Ulrich Teichert|e-mail: Ulrich.Teichert@gmx.de | Listening to:
Stormweg 24               |Pale Bride (The Von Bondies), The Assault (Digital
24539 Neumuenster, Germany|Leather), Sacred Decay (The Estranged)



Reply to: