[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#421779: marked as done (linux-source-2.6.18: Poweroff doesn't work on Sony VAIO S4M)

Your message dated Sat, 29 Nov 2008 03:32:30 +0100
with message-id <20081129023230.GA18155@galadriel.inutil.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#421779: linux-source-2.6.18: Poweroff doesn't work on Sony VAIO S4M
has caused the Debian Bug report #421779,
regarding linux-source-2.6.18: Poweroff doesn't work on Sony VAIO S4M
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
421779: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=421779
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: linux-source-2.6.18
Version: 2.6.18.dfsg.1-12
Severity: normal


I've tried recompiling the kernel , playing with ACPI options (kernel 
configurations and acpi= parameters) , but POWEROFF doesn't work.

When I do "shutdown -h now" the system starts powering off and then 
stops with the line :

acpi_power_off called

I've also tried the lastest mainline vanilla kernel 2.6.21.1 and I've 
got the same problem.

I've also tried powering off by APM and what I've got is a black screen 
after shutdown -h now finish to umounting the filesystems , but the 
system remains on (Fan spinning and the screen is black , but the LCD 
backlight is still on).

I will attach my dmesg in the next message .


-- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
  APT prefers stable
  APT policy: (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.18
Locale: LANG=it_IT.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=it_IT.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

Versions of packages linux-source-2.6.18 depends on:
ii  binutils                      2.17-3     The GNU assembler, linker and bina
ii  bzip2                         1.0.3-6    high-quality block-sorting file co

Versions of packages linux-source-2.6.18 recommends:
ii  gcc                         4:4.1.1-15   The GNU C compiler
ii  libc6-dev [libc-dev]        2.3.6.ds1-13 GNU C Library: Development Librari
ii  make                        3.81-2       The GNU version of the "make" util

-- no debconf information

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Version: 2.6.26-1

On Sat, Nov 29, 2008 at 03:28:07AM +0100, Michele Cascella wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Sat, Nov 29, 2008 at 2:23 AM, Moritz Muehlenhoff <jmm@inutil.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, May 01, 2007 at 02:28:28PM +0200, Marcello Maggioni wrote:
> > > Package: linux-source-2.6.18
> > > Version: 2.6.18.dfsg.1-12
> > > Severity: normal
> > >
> > >
> > > I've tried recompiling the kernel , playing with ACPI options (kernel
> > > configurations and acpi= parameters) , but POWEROFF doesn't work.
> > >
> > > When I do "shutdown -h now" the system starts powering off and then
> > > stops with the line :
> > >
> > > acpi_power_off called
> > >
> > > I've also tried the lastest mainline vanilla kernel 2.6.21.1 and I've
> > > got the same problem.
> > >
> > > I've also tried powering off by APM and what I've got is a black screen
> > > after shutdown -h now finish to umounting the filesystems , but the
> > > system remains on (Fan spinning and the screen is black , but the LCD
> > > backlight is still on).
> > >
> > > I will attach my dmesg in the next message .
> >
> > Does this error still occur with more recent kernel versions?
> >
> 
> problems is fixed in 2.6.26 (but this kernel has other issues with the
> sony S5 hw)

Ok, please file separate bugs for these issues if necessary.
I'm closing this bug.
 
> > If you're running Etch, could you try to reproduce this bug
> > with the 2.6.24 based kernel added in 4.0r4?
> > http://packages.qa.debian.org/l/linux-2.6.24.html
> 
> I'm running testing now. I think the kernel from etch-and-a-half is
> not compatible with my HAL. I'll see if I can try it.

If you're running testing by now, running the tests with 2.6.24 isn't
really necessary. This is mostly a suggestion for people running Etch
on their systems.

Cheers,
        Moritz

--- End Message ---
Reply to: