[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#421775: marked as done (linux-2.6: Quirky console)



Your message dated Sat, 29 Nov 2008 01:51:21 +0100
with message-id <20081129005121.GA12941@galadriel.inutil.org>
and subject line Re: linux-2.6: Still there
has caused the Debian Bug report #421775,
regarding linux-2.6: Quirky console
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
421775: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=421775
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: linux-2.6
Severity: normal

When viewing a lot of text is output on the console (cat /var/log/syslog), the
cursor ends up "below" the visible area, together with the last lines of text. 
The visible area will still be scrolled upward appropriately as more 
text is entered. Switching VT back and forth will correct the problem.

I'm using fbcon on nvidiafb.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.18
Locale: LANG=sv_SE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=sv_SE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 07:16:29PM +0100, Vincent Lönngren wrote:
> tis 2008-11-11 klockan 00:19 +0100 skrev Moritz Muehlenhoff:
> > Does this error still occur with more recent kernel versions?
> > 
> > Cheers,
> >         Moritz
> 
> I don't know and I can't check, because I'm not using that computer
> anymore.

Closing the bug then, since it's rather old anyway.

Cheers,
        Moritz


--- End Message ---

Reply to: