Your message dated Fri, 28 Nov 2008 23:24:35 +0100 with message-id <20081128222435.GA8646@galadriel.inutil.org> and subject line Re: Bug#281248: pm2fb does not work has caused the Debian Bug report #281248, regarding pm2fb does not work to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 281248: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=281248 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: pm2fb does not work
- From: Clint Adams <schizo@debian.org>
- Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2004 13:28:00 -0500
- Message-id: <20041114182800.GA5426@scowler.net>
Package: kernel-image-2.6.8-1-sparc64 Version: 2.6.8-3 The Permedia2 framebuffer driver does not work on a SB100. It works in kernel-image-2.4.26-sparc64.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Clint Adams <schizo@debian.org>
- Cc: 281248-done@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Bug#281248: pm2fb does not work
- From: Moritz Muehlenhoff <jmm@inutil.org>
- Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2008 23:24:35 +0100
- Message-id: <20081128222435.GA8646@galadriel.inutil.org>
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20081128165705.GA2430@scru.org>
- References: <20041114182800.GA5426@scowler.net> <20041115054624.GA17955@verge.net.au> <20050515064848.GA28093@pegasos> <[🔎] 20081127225914.GA17498@galadriel.inutil.org> <[🔎] 20081128165705.GA2430@scru.org>
On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 04:57:05PM +0000, Clint Adams wrote: > On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 11:59:14PM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > > Clint, since last year pm2fb seems to be under active maintenance again. Do > > you still own that machine, does it work for you with current kernels, such > > as the 2.6.24 kernel from Etch 4.0r4 or the Lenny kernel? > > Unfortunately I no longer have such a machine. Closing the bug, since there's not much point in keeping it open. Cheers, Moritz
--- End Message ---