[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#456882: marked as done (Should linux-image-2.6-k7 depend on linux-image-2.6.23-1-486/686?)

Your message dated Sun, 14 Sep 2008 00:13:30 +0200
with message-id <20080913221330.GC12288@wavehammer.waldi.eu.org>
and subject line fixed
has caused the Debian Bug report #456882,
regarding Should linux-image-2.6-k7 depend on linux-image-2.6.23-1-486/686?
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
456882: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=456882
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: linux-image-2.6-k7
Version: 2.6.22+11

Hello,
I did wonder why the k7 flavor of the 2.6.23 linux-image does not show up in debian/sid for a while now. As I did find out the k7 flavor has been dropped. Is this correct? The question now is which linux image should one install instead? The 486 or the 686 flavor?
To make this clear the meta package linux-image-2.6-k7 should IMHO depend on the preferred current linux image. 

Thanks,
Gert

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
| Package: linux-image-2.6-k7
| Source: linux-latest-2.6 (16)
| Version: 2.6.26+16
| Depends: linux-image-2.6-686

Bastian

-- 
Yes, it is written.  Good shall always destroy evil.
		-- Sirah the Yang, "The Omega Glory", stardate unknown

--- End Message ---
Reply to: