Bug#490293: marked as done (linux-image-2.6.24-etchnhalf.1-686: CONFIG_SMB_FS is not set)
Your message dated Fri, 11 Jul 2008 13:35:05 +0200
with message-id <20080711113505.GA18327@wavehammer.waldi.eu.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#490293: linux-image-2.6.24-etchnhalf.1-686: CONFIG_SMB_FS is not set
has caused the Debian Bug report #490293,
regarding linux-image-2.6.24-etchnhalf.1-686: CONFIG_SMB_FS is not set
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
490293: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=490293
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: linux-image-2.6.24-etchnhalf.1-686
Version: 2.6.24-6~etchnhalf.3
Severity: wishlist
CONFIG_SMB_FS is not set
in the kernel config. it would be nice to have smbfs
-- Package-specific info:
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
APT prefers stable
APT policy: (500, 'stable'), (103, 'proposed-updates')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.21-1-k7
Locale: LANG=hu_HU.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=hu_HU.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to en_US.UTF-8)
Versions of packages linux-image-2.6.24-etchnhalf.1-686 depends on:
ii debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.5.11etch1 Debian configuration management sy
ii initramfs-tools [linux-initr 0.85h tools for generating an initramfs
ii module-init-tools 3.3-pre4-2 tools for managing Linux kernel mo
Versions of packages linux-image-2.6.24-etchnhalf.1-686 recommends:
ii libc6-i686 2.3.6.ds1-13etch5 GNU C Library: Shared libraries [i
-- debconf information:
linux-image-2.6.24-etchnhalf.1-686/postinst/depmod-error-2.6.24-etchnhalf.1-686: false
linux-image-2.6.24-etchnhalf.1-686/postinst/old-dir-initrd-link-2.6.24-etchnhalf.1-686: true
linux-image-2.6.24-etchnhalf.1-686/preinst/initrd-2.6.24-etchnhalf.1-686:
linux-image-2.6.24-etchnhalf.1-686/postinst/kimage-is-a-directory:
linux-image-2.6.24-etchnhalf.1-686/preinst/abort-install-2.6.24-etchnhalf.1-686:
linux-image-2.6.24-etchnhalf.1-686/prerm/removing-running-kernel-2.6.24-etchnhalf.1-686: true
linux-image-2.6.24-etchnhalf.1-686/preinst/lilo-has-ramdisk:
linux-image-2.6.24-etchnhalf.1-686/postinst/bootloader-error-2.6.24-etchnhalf.1-686:
linux-image-2.6.24-etchnhalf.1-686/postinst/old-initrd-link-2.6.24-etchnhalf.1-686: true
linux-image-2.6.24-etchnhalf.1-686/preinst/bootloader-initrd-2.6.24-etchnhalf.1-686: true
linux-image-2.6.24-etchnhalf.1-686/preinst/elilo-initrd-2.6.24-etchnhalf.1-686: true
shared/kernel-image/really-run-bootloader: true
linux-image-2.6.24-etchnhalf.1-686/preinst/abort-overwrite-2.6.24-etchnhalf.1-686:
linux-image-2.6.24-etchnhalf.1-686/prerm/would-invalidate-boot-loader-2.6.24-etchnhalf.1-686: true
linux-image-2.6.24-etchnhalf.1-686/preinst/overwriting-modules-2.6.24-etchnhalf.1-686: true
linux-image-2.6.24-etchnhalf.1-686/postinst/old-system-map-link-2.6.24-etchnhalf.1-686: true
linux-image-2.6.24-etchnhalf.1-686/postinst/depmod-error-initrd-2.6.24-etchnhalf.1-686: false
linux-image-2.6.24-etchnhalf.1-686/preinst/lilo-initrd-2.6.24-etchnhalf.1-686: true
linux-image-2.6.24-etchnhalf.1-686/preinst/failed-to-move-modules-2.6.24-etchnhalf.1-686:
linux-image-2.6.24-etchnhalf.1-686/postinst/bootloader-test-error-2.6.24-etchnhalf.1-686:
linux-image-2.6.24-etchnhalf.1-686/postinst/create-kimage-link-2.6.24-etchnhalf.1-686: true
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 12:33:11PM +0200, Hámorszky Balázs wrote:
> CONFIG_SMB_FS is not set
> in the kernel config. it would be nice to have smbfs
The option is described as "SMB file system support (OBSOLETE, please
use CIFS)". Just follow it and use cifs.
Bastian
--
It is necessary to have purpose.
-- Alice #1, "I, Mudd", stardate 4513.3
--- End Message ---
Reply to: