[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#435248: marked as done (linux-image-2.6.21-2-k7: non-clean unistall)



Your message dated Wed, 2 Jul 2008 17:30:15 +0200
with message-id <20080702153015.GY25863@stro.at>
and subject line Re: linux-image-2.6.21-2-k7: non-clean unistall
has caused the Debian Bug report #435248,
regarding linux-image-2.6.21-2-k7: non-clean unistall
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
435248: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=435248
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: linux-image-2.6.21-2-k7
Version: Non-clean unistall
Severity: normal

aptitude after purging this kernel leaves a file:

  /lib/modules/2.6.21-2-k7/modules.seriomap

Mirek

-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-4-k7 (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=pl_PL, LC_CTYPE=pl_PL (charmap=ISO-8859-2) (ignored: LC_ALL set to pl_PL)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

Versions of packages linux-image-2.6.21-2-k7 depends on:
ii  initramfs-tools [linux-initr 0.89        tools for generating an initramfs
ii  module-init-tools            3.3-pre11-4 tools for managing Linux kernel mo

Versions of packages linux-image-2.6.21-2-k7 recommends:
ii  libc6-i686                    2.6-2      GNU C Library: Shared libraries [i


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 2.6.22-1

> aptitude after purging this kernel leaves a file:
>  /lib/modules/2.6.21-2-k7/modules.seriomap

fixed since long. 

-- 
maks


--- End Message ---

Reply to: