[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#276500: marked as done (system call need nanosecond resolution)



Your message dated Sun, 22 Jun 2008 09:18:13 +0200
with message-id <20080622071813.GA10164@wavehammer.waldi.eu.org>
and subject line #276500: utimensat added as syscall
has caused the Debian Bug report #276500,
regarding system call need nanosecond resolution
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
276500: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=276500
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: kernel-image-2.6.8-1-k7
Version: 2.6.8-3
Severity: normal

$ touch -r a b
$ stat -c %y a b
2004-10-13 11:36:18.169474381 +0800
2004-10-13 11:36:18.169474000 +0800
the difference messes up test -nt, make, cp -u, etc. etc.

From: Paul Eggert <eggert@CS.UCLA.EDU>
Subject: Re: cp -up forever
Cc: 239288@bugs.debian.org, bug-coreutils@gnu.org

"touch" operates by means of system calls.  If the system calls
mishandle submicrosecond time stamps, "touch" will as well.  So you'll
have to direct your bug reports to the kernel people who have
misdesigned their system calls.

The basic problem is that utimes() has only microsecond resolution;
the kernel need to add a system call ("utimens()", say?) that supports
nanosecond resolution.


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 2.6.22-1

There is a new syscall in 2.6.22, utimensat. It gets a "struct timespec"
which allows nanosecond resultion.

It is currently supported on any arch except hppa. Therefor I believe
this as resolved from the kernel side.

Bastian

-- 
Actual war is a very messy business.  Very, very messy business.
		-- Kirk, "A Taste of Armageddon", stardate 3193.0

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


--- End Message ---

Reply to: