[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#485882: marked as done (linux-image-2.6.18-6-k7: Module zd1211rw locks up networking)



Your message dated Fri, 13 Jun 2008 12:21:55 +0200
with message-id <20080613102155.GC7212@baikonur.stro.at>
and subject line Re: Bug#485882: linux-image-2.6.18-6-k7: Module zd1211rw locks up networking
has caused the Debian Bug report #485882,
regarding linux-image-2.6.18-6-k7: Module zd1211rw locks up networking
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
485882: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=485882
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: linux-image-2.6.18-6-k7
Version: 2.6.18.dfsg.1-18etch6
Severity: normal



-- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
  APT prefers stable
  APT policy: (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-6-k7
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

Versions of packages linux-image-2.6.18-6-k7 depends on:
ii  coreutils                    5.97-5.3    The GNU core utilities
ii  debconf [debconf-2.0]        1.5.11etch1 Debian configuration management sy
ii  initramfs-tools [linux-initr 0.85h       tools for generating an initramfs
ii  module-init-tools            3.3-pre4-2  tools for managing Linux kernel mo

Versions of packages linux-image-2.6.18-6-k7 recommends:
ii  libc6-i686             2.3.6.ds1-13etch5 GNU C Library: Shared libraries [i

-- debconf information:
  linux-image-2.6.18-6-k7/preinst/initrd-2.6.18-6-k7:
  linux-image-2.6.18-6-k7/preinst/abort-install-2.6.18-6-k7:
  shared/kernel-image/really-run-bootloader: true
  linux-image-2.6.18-6-k7/prerm/removing-running-kernel-2.6.18-6-k7: true
  linux-image-2.6.18-6-k7/postinst/kimage-is-a-directory:
  linux-image-2.6.18-6-k7/postinst/create-kimage-link-2.6.18-6-k7: true
  linux-image-2.6.18-6-k7/postinst/old-dir-initrd-link-2.6.18-6-k7: true
  linux-image-2.6.18-6-k7/postinst/depmod-error-2.6.18-6-k7: false
  linux-image-2.6.18-6-k7/postinst/bootloader-test-error-2.6.18-6-k7:
  linux-image-2.6.18-6-k7/preinst/lilo-has-ramdisk:
  linux-image-2.6.18-6-k7/preinst/abort-overwrite-2.6.18-6-k7:
* linux-image-2.6.18-6-k7/preinst/already-running-this-2.6.18-6-k7:
  linux-image-2.6.18-6-k7/preinst/elilo-initrd-2.6.18-6-k7: true
  linux-image-2.6.18-6-k7/preinst/failed-to-move-modules-2.6.18-6-k7:
  linux-image-2.6.18-6-k7/prerm/would-invalidate-boot-loader-2.6.18-6-k7: true
  linux-image-2.6.18-6-k7/preinst/lilo-initrd-2.6.18-6-k7: true
  linux-image-2.6.18-6-k7/postinst/depmod-error-initrd-2.6.18-6-k7: false
  linux-image-2.6.18-6-k7/preinst/bootloader-initrd-2.6.18-6-k7: true
  linux-image-2.6.18-6-k7/postinst/old-system-map-link-2.6.18-6-k7: true
  linux-image-2.6.18-6-k7/preinst/overwriting-modules-2.6.18-6-k7: true
  linux-image-2.6.18-6-k7/postinst/bootloader-error-2.6.18-6-k7:
  linux-image-2.6.18-6-k7/postinst/old-initrd-link-2.6.18-6-k7: true



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 2.6.24-1

[ thanks for the next time to keep bug report on cc!
  could be easily lost in personal stuff or spam ]


On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 11:55:03AM +0200, Oliver Vollmer wrote:
> 
> 2.6.24 seems to work. What i did.

ok thus closing.
 
> I build the own kernel of the 2.6.24 Debian source, used the Configfile from
> linux-image-2.6.18-6-486.deb, changed cpu type to k7 and compiled it.
> 
> My i ask this greenly question: Why is there no more k7 Kernel?

not enough users, too many images. just use 686 if it works on your box
or 486 as fallback.
 
zd1211rw was a young driver in 2.6.18 no wonder it fails there.

best regards

-- 
maks


--- End Message ---

Reply to: