[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

sata_nv ADMA breaks ATAPI 4Gof RAM (AMD64?) and Which kernel will Lenny likely use when it is released?



Please reply off-list

If you try to mount a SATA DVD or CDROM and have more than 4G on a amd64 system:

$mount cdrom
mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/scd0,
       missing codepage or helper program, or other error
       In some cases useful info is found in syslog - try
       dmesg | tail  or so

$ tail syslog
Jun 12 14:30:17 singapore kernel: UDF-fs: No VRS found

But these error messages are a bit misleading - see the links below


I would think that they would fix the 2.6.24 4G bug if that is what they will release with, but from what I read that isn't going to happen?

Seems like it would be a bad idea to release with a kernel that prevents mounting the CDrom if you have 4G of memory.

I can't find this bug listed in debian for linux-image-2.6.24-1-amd64, but I'm not sure that is the right place for it.


links:
http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/1/11/6
http://linux.derkeiler.com/Mailing-Lists/Kernel/2007-11/msg07780.html
http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-ide@vger.kernel.org/msg14797.html

There is a patch around #55
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=351451

I'm thinking of pulling in 2.6.25 from unstable for my machine running lenny, but don't want to create other problems once it goes stable.

How can I find the ETA of 2.6.25 entering lenny? (I think some of lenny is already frozen - would
that include the linux-image? (it isn't on the frozen list?)).


----------------------------------------------------------------
Karl Schmidt                         EMail Karl@xtronics.com
Transtronics, Inc.                     WEB http://xtronics.com
3209 West 9th Street                    Ph (785) 841-3089
Lawrence, KS 66049                     FAX (785) 841-0434

True wisdom is knowing what we don't know;
True maturity is being comfortable with the idea of not knowing.  -KPS

----------------------------------------------------------------


Reply to: