[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#482703: marked as done (linux-image-686: kernel is xen enabled by default)



Your message dated Sat, 24 May 2008 17:15:39 +0200
with message-id <20080524151539.GA463@wavehammer.waldi.eu.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#482703: linux-image-686: kernel is xen enabled by default
has caused the Debian Bug report #482703,
regarding linux-image-686: kernel is xen enabled by default
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
482703: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=482703
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: linux-image-686
Version: 2.6.25+14
Severity: normal

grep XEN /boot/config-2.6.25-2-686
CONFIG_XEN=y
CONFIG_XEN_BLKDEV_FRONTEND=m
CONFIG_XEN_NETDEV_FRONTEND=m
CONFIG_HVC_XEN=y


-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.25-2-686 (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

Versions of packages linux-image-686 depends on:
ii  linux-image-2.6-686           2.6.25+14  Linux 2.6 image on PPro/Celeron/PI

linux-image-686 recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Sat, May 24, 2008 at 04:43:56PM +0200, zsuzsi wrote:
> grep XEN /boot/config-2.6.25-2-686
> CONFIG_XEN=y

No bug, read old bugs for the same problem before reporting a new one.

Bastian

-- 
Fascinating, a totally parochial attitude.
		-- Spock, "Metamorphosis", stardate 3219.8


--- End Message ---

Reply to: