Bug#479266: marked as done (depending on packages with no available version in archive)
Your message dated Sun, 4 May 2008 14:06:57 +0200
with message-id <20080504120657.GZ27599@baikonur.stro.at>
and subject line Re: Bug#479266: depending on packages with no available version in archive
has caused the Debian Bug report #479266,
regarding depending on packages with no available version in archive
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
479266: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=479266
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: linux-image-2.6-686
Version: 2.6.24+13
Severity: wishlist
Isn't it a bad thing to depend on something not available, even just for a day?
$ apt-cache show linux-image-686|grep Depends
Depends: linux-image-2.6-686
$ apt-cache show linux-image-2.6-686|grep Depends
Depends: linux-image-2.6.24-1-686
$ apt-show-versions linux-image-2.6.24-1-686
linux-image-2.6.24-1-686 2.6.24-6 installed: No available version in archive
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Sun, May 04, 2008 at 06:50:29AM +0800, jidanni@jidanni.org wrote:
> Package: linux-image-2.6-686
> Version: 2.6.24+13
> Severity: wishlist
>
> Isn't it a bad thing to depend on something not available, even just for a day?
closing as just unstable and yes coordination could be better.
but hey there is the old saying don't use unstable if you can't fix it.
--- End Message ---
Reply to: