Re: Changes for 2.6.25

To: debian-kernel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Changes for 2.6.25
From: Martin Michlmayr <tbm@cyrius.com>
Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2008 16:40:11 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 20080322154011.GA3333@deprecation.cyrius.com>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20080319184957.GA12130@torres.zugschlus.de>
References: <20080214184328.GA26656@wavehammer.waldi.eu.org> <[🔎] 20080319140647.GA4459@deprecation.cyrius.com> <[🔎] 20080319144721.GA24414@wavehammer.waldi.eu.org> <[🔎] 20080319184957.GA12130@torres.zugschlus.de>

* Marc Haber <mh+debian-kernel@zugschlus.de> [2008-03-19 19:49]:
> > Sure. The documentation is the source,
> Am I the only one finding this unacceptable?

Well, it's certainly not ideal...
-- 
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/

Reply to:

References:
- Re: Changes for 2.6.25
  - From: Martin Michlmayr <tbm@cyrius.com>
- Re: Changes for 2.6.25
  - From: Bastian Blank <waldi@debian.org>
- Re: Changes for 2.6.25
  - From: Marc Haber <mh+debian-kernel@zugschlus.de>

Prev by Date: Bug#284221: Go where no man has ventured
Next by Date: Re: [kernel] r10934 - dists/trunk/linux-2.6/debian/patches/series
Previous by thread: Re: Changes for 2.6.25
Next by thread: Bug#466933: marked as done (Debian-arm: kernel BUG at fs/inode.c:250!)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread