Re: About xen and amd64
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, Feb 01, 2008 at 06:42:18PM +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
>On Fri, Feb 01, 2008 at 12:34:22PM +0100, Holger Levsen wrote:
>> On Friday 01 February 2008 01:03, maximilian attems wrote:
>> > On Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 03:19:20PM -0430, Nelson Nieto wrote:
>> > > there is a problem with xen and amd64 with the testing or unstable kernel
>> > > ?
>> > bug upstream instead of bitching around :)
>>
>> Could you please stop cursing at users? (And start giving more useful
>> information.) "Known issue, upstream is aware. Please help there if you can."
>
>you seem to heavily overlook humour, aka misunderstand
>netiquette says that sentences ending with smiles shouldn't
>be taken to the letter.
>
>i don't expect a random ml submitter to help on the xen disaster
>even if full time paid fedora xen guys currently seem only to
>reach 30% of their goals
>http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/XenPvops
>
>> Thanks for your consideration.
>
>cool down, over and out
>bon weekend
Yeah, just get used to those lame comments from Max :)
Sad thing is the collateral damage.
- Jonas
- --
Jonas Smedegaard <jonas@jones.dk> http://www.jones.dk/~jonas/
IT-guide dr. Jones <dr@jones.dk> http://dr.jones.dk/ +45 40843136
Debian GNU/Linux <js@debian.org> http://www.debian.org/
GnuPG(1024D/C02440B8): 9A98 C6EB C098 9ED0 3085 ECA9 9FB0 DB32 C024 40B8
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFHo2WUn7DbMsAkQLgRAsbYAJ9LcD28JW3Pe48rfa33NlWrk70VUgCeJ0Il
KIXOJuAmj371CF5r/Dp/7K8=
=imNi
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: