Bug#447018: marked as done (BUG: warning at kernel/cpu.c:51/unlock_cpu_hotplug() patch)
Your message dated Thu, 31 Jan 2008 16:46:07 +0100
with message-id <20080131154607.GQ1446@baikonur.stro.at>
and subject line BUG: warning at kernel/cpu.c:51/unlock_cpu_hotplug() patch
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message ---
- To: submit@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: BUG: warning at kernel/cpu.c:51/unlock_cpu_hotplug() patch
- From: abridgett@smop.co.uk (Adrian Bridgett)
- Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 13:40:05 +0100
- Message-id: <20071017124003.GA1526@vasquez.smop.co.uk>
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.18.dfsg.1-13etch3
Severity: minor
Hi,
We are getting loads of these:
Call Trace:
[<ffffffff8025d000>] .text.lock.mutex+0x5/0x14
[<ffffffff80293e27>] unlock_cpu_hotplug+0x3f/0x6c
[<ffffffff8027d958>] sched_getaffinity+0x7e/0x93
[<ffffffff8029c612>] compat_sys_sched_getaffinity+0x1d/0x4c
[<ffffffff8025aa87>] sysenter_do_call+0x1b/0x67
There is a patch at: http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/2/16/4 which I've
confirmed is in 2.6.22. The actual error isn't harmful, just
annoying/worrying!
It would be great if this "swap two lines" patch could be included in
the next etch release.
Thanks,
Adrian
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: 447018-done@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Re: BUG: warning at kernel/cpu.c:51/unlock_cpu_hotplug() patch
- From: maximilian attems <max@stro.at>
- Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2008 16:46:07 +0100
- Message-id: <20080131154607.GQ1446@baikonur.stro.at>
Version: 2.6.22-1
this is only a warn_on() so mostly harmless,
also etch will get a newer optional kernel >= 2.6.22
thus closing
--- End Message ---
Reply to: