Your message dated Thu, 31 Jan 2008 15:57:06 +0100 with message-id <20080131145706.GI1446@baikonur.stro.at> and subject line check for non-free firmware has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message ---
- To: submit@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Re: check for non-free firmware (Re: Debian's Linux kernel continues to regress on freedom)
- From: Holger Levsen <holger@layer-acht.org>
- Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 13:53:23 +0200
- Message-id: <200709141353.30136.holger@layer-acht.org>
- In-reply-to: <20070914103358.GA13596@thorin>
- References: <20070912043905.GA6120@doctormoo.dyndns.org> <200709140329.37710.holger@layer-acht.org> <20070914103358.GA13596@thorin>
Package: linux-2.6 Severity: wishlist X-Debbugs-CC: debian-kernel@lists.debian.org, debian-devel@lists.debian.org On Friday 14 September 2007 12:33, Robert Millan wrote: > Please could you add some check in debian/rules to prevent non-free > firmware from inadvertingly entering the linux-2.6 package, as described in > the mail quoted below? > > On Fri, Sep 14, 2007 at 03:29:29AM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Wednesday 12 September 2007 15:37, Robert Millan wrote: > > > > There isn't any patch that should be required here. There is already > > > > a script in the kernel team repo to be used for pruning non-free > > > > firmware from the tarball, and it appears that whoever produced the > > > > initial uploads of 2.6.21 and 2.6.22 for Debian omitted this step. > > > > > > Why not running this script in debian/rules, causing builds to abort > > > when the non-free files are still present? > > > > Seems like a good idea, except that the script will also fail if upstream > > removes something - I don't know how often this happens though. > > > > I guess this info should be added to some bug, so it does eventually > > happen ;-) > > Done. Almost, but now :) regards, HolgerAttachment: pgpCRgKTgky9K.pgp
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: 442251-done@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: check for non-free firmware
- From: maximilian attems <max@stro.at>
- Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2008 15:57:06 +0100
- Message-id: <20080131145706.GI1446@baikonur.stro.at>
Version: 2.6.23-1 genorig removes the relevant files, thus closing.
--- End Message ---