[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#463223: marked as done (initramfs-tools: missing dependency on mktemp? Fails to configure without it)

Your message dated Wed, 30 Jan 2008 19:17:20 +0100
with message-id <20080130181720.GC1446@baikonur.stro.at>
and subject line Bug#463223: initramfs-tools: missing dependency on mktemp? Fails to configure without it
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: initramfs-tools
Version: 0.91d
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 3.5

On update/upgrade of a sid machine today, initramfs-tools failed to
configure, because it tries to use mktemp, while it was not installed
on that machine.

If it needs it, it must depend on it.

-- 
Lionel

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 06:59:07PM +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
> > 
> > On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 12:27:37PM +0100, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
> >> Package: initramfs-tools
> >> Version: 0.91d
> >> Severity: serious
> >> Justification: Policy 3.5
> >>
> >> On update/upgrade of a sid machine today, initramfs-tools failed to
> >> configure, because it tries to use mktemp, while it was not installed
> >> on that machine.
> > 
> > apt-cache show mktemp | egrep '^(Essential|Priority)'
> > Essential: yes
> > Priority: required
> > 
> >  
> >> If it needs it, it must depend on it.
> > 
> > your install is broken, fix it.
> 
> Any reason why the bug was not closed?

day distraction and giving reporter time to voice
if i may be wrong, but yes i intend to close,
so doing now.
 
> Cheers
> 
> Luk

--- End Message ---
Reply to: