Martin Michlmayr wrote: > I'll add armel support to SVN trunk in the next few weeks based on > your patches (thanks). 2.6.18 is frozen for etch so I'm not sure it > makes sense to add it at this point (although it probably also > wouldn't break anything). Would it greatly help to have this in the > 2.6.18 package or is it okay if I apply it to SVN trunk (i.e. for > 2.6.20). It doesn't matter, really, armel is not targeted at etch, so as long as the patch is there we'll be set for lenny. -- see shy jo
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature