Bug#391867: linux-image-2.6.18-4 still broken
Hello!
I just wanted to mention that the bug disussed here still exists on my
box using the kernel from
http://people.debian.org/~nobse/kernel/linux-2.6/i386/
(in my case linux-image-2.6.18-4-k7_2.6.18-9_i386.deb)
Here the output from dmesg:
[...]
Type: Direct-Access ANSI SCSI revision: 00
sd 0:0:0:0: Attached scsi removable disk sda
sd 0:0:0:1: Attached scsi removable disk sdb
sd 0:0:0:2: Attached scsi removable disk sdc
usb-storage: device scan complete
sd 0:0:0:3: Attached scsi removable disk sdd
ata2: port is slow to respond, please be patient
ata2: port failed to respond (30 secs)
ata2: softreset failed (device not ready)
ata2: softreset failed, retrying in 5 secs
ata2: port is slow to respond, please be patient
ata2: port failed to respond (30 secs)
ata2: COMRESET failed (device not ready)
ata2: hardreset failed, retrying in 5 secs
ata2: port is slow to respond, please be patient
ata2: port failed to respond (30 secs)
ata2: COMRESET failed (device not ready)
ata2: reset failed, giving up
scsi3 : ahci
ata3: SATA link down (SStatus 0 SControl 300)
scsi4 : ahci
ata4: SATA link down (SStatus 0 SControl 300)
Vendor: ATA Model: ST3160812AS Rev: 3.AH
Type: Direct-Access ANSI SCSI revision: 05
SCSI device sde: 312581808 512-byte hdwr sectors (160042 MB)
sde: Write Protect is off
sde: Mode Sense: 00 3a 00 00
SCSI device sde: drive cache: write back
SCSI device sde: 312581808 512-byte hdwr sectors (160042 MB)
sde: Write Protect is off
sde: Mode Sense: 00 3a 00 00
SCSI device sde: drive cache: write back
sde: sde1 sde2
sd 1:0:0:0: Attached scsi disk sde
kjournald starting. Commit interval 5 seconds
[...]
A further issue which - imho is coupled w/ this one - is that my cd/dvd
combo drive does not seem to work: firstly there is no inidication in
dmesg that it was fond an secondly it behaves like dead: it does not
open if i press the button and it does not blink; it can be opened until
these message appear on the screen.
Is there another kernel version (prefferably as *.deb) that i could test?
Cheers,
Sigmund
Reply to: