Your message dated Tue, 30 Jan 2007 11:29:27 +0100 (CET) with message-id <Pine.LNX.4.60.0701301124440.22849@trudy.cli.di.unipi.it> and subject line Closing: it's not a bug has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: linux-image-2.6.16-1-686: p4-clockmod does not work anymore
- From: Giuseppe D'Angelo <dangelo@cli.di.unipi.it>
- Date: Tue, 04 Apr 2006 17:49:45 +0200
- Message-id: <20060404154945.4658.89122.reportbug@alien>
Package: linux-image-2.6.16-1-686 Version: 2.6.16-5 Severity: normal Hi. After upgrading to a 2.6.16 kernel the module p4-clockmod doesn't work anymore: # modprobe p4-clockmod FATAL: Error inserting p4_clockmod (/lib/modules/2.6.16-1-686/kernel/arch/i386/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/p4-clockmod.ko): No such device That was working perfectly under 2.6.15. Regards, Giuseppe D'Angelo -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Kernel: Linux 2.6.15-1-686 Locale: LANG=it_IT@euro, LC_CTYPE=it_IT@euro (charmap=ISO-8859-15) Versions of packages linux-image-2.6.16-1-686 depends on: ii module-init-tools 3.2.2-2 tools for managing Linux kernel mo ii yaird [linux-initramfs-tool] 0.0.12-9 Yet Another mkInitRD Versions of packages linux-image-2.6.16-1-686 recommends: ii libc6-i686 2.3.6-4 GNU C Library: Shared libraries [i -- debconf information: linux-image-2.6.16-1-686/preinst/initrd-2.6.16-1-686: linux-image-2.6.16-1-686/postinst/create-kimage-link-2.6.16-1-686: true linux-image-2.6.16-1-686/preinst/lilo-has-ramdisk: linux-image-2.6.16-1-686/prerm/removing-running-kernel-2.6.16-1-686: true linux-image-2.6.16-1-686/postinst/old-dir-initrd-link-2.6.16-1-686: true linux-image-2.6.16-1-686/postinst/depmod-error-initrd-2.6.16-1-686: false linux-image-2.6.16-1-686/preinst/lilo-initrd-2.6.16-1-686: true linux-image-2.6.16-1-686/postinst/old-system-map-link-2.6.16-1-686: true linux-image-2.6.16-1-686/postinst/kimage-is-a-directory: linux-image-2.6.16-1-686/preinst/bootloader-initrd-2.6.16-1-686: true linux-image-2.6.16-1-686/preinst/already-running-this-2.6.16-1-686: linux-image-2.6.16-1-686/preinst/overwriting-modules-2.6.16-1-686: true linux-image-2.6.16-1-686/postinst/old-initrd-link-2.6.16-1-686: true linux-image-2.6.16-1-686/preinst/abort-overwrite-2.6.16-1-686: linux-image-2.6.16-1-686/postinst/depmod-error-2.6.16-1-686: false linux-image-2.6.16-1-686/preinst/failed-to-move-modules-2.6.16-1-686: linux-image-2.6.16-1-686/preinst/elilo-initrd-2.6.16-1-686: true linux-image-2.6.16-1-686/prerm/would-invalidate-boot-loader-2.6.16-1-686: true linux-image-2.6.16-1-686/postinst/bootloader-error-2.6.16-1-686: linux-image-2.6.16-1-686/preinst/abort-install-2.6.16-1-686: linux-image-2.6.16-1-686/postinst/bootloader-test-error-2.6.16-1-686:Attachment: cpuinfo
Description: application/empty
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: 360773-done@bugs.debian.org
- Cc: maximilian attems <maks@sternwelten.at>, dann frazier <dannf@debian.org>
- Subject: Closing: it's not a bug
- From: Giuseppe D'Angelo <dangelo@cli.di.unipi.it>
- Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 11:29:27 +0100 (CET)
- Message-id: <Pine.LNX.4.60.0701301124440.22849@trudy.cli.di.unipi.it>
I'm closing this bug:------- Additional Comment #6 From Dave Jones 2006-07-28 20:01 ------- The lower frequencies were removed in later kernels as part of an errataworkaround. It's possible that using them on affected CPUs can cause lockups.So it's not a kernel bug, and I don't believe that upstream will fix this. Thank you very much for your support, however. Cheers, --- Giuseppe D'Angelo dangelo@cli.di.unipi.it
--- End Message ---