[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#457601: marked as done (Bad version number of rt73-modules-* packages)



Your message dated Mon, 24 Dec 2007 16:23:16 +0100
with message-id <56f6ed4a0712240723s711468a3s1c1ae6b0bc165b74@mail.gmail.com>
and subject line Bug#457601: Bad version number of rt73-modules-* packages
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: linux-modules-contrib-2.6
Version: 2.6.22-4
Severity: important

Hi.

I think your linux-modules-contrib package generates bad version
number for rt73-modules.
The version number for module package should be the version of
rt73-source package, i.e.
1:1.0.3.6-cvs20071123-dfsg1-2.
-- 
 .''`.    Piotr Roszatycki
: :' :    mailto:Piotr.Roszatycki@gmail.com
`. `'     mailto:dexter@debian.org
  `-



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
2007/12/24, Bastian Blank <waldi@debian.org>:
> tags 457601 moreinfo
> thanks
>
> On Sun, Dec 23, 2007 at 08:51:30PM +0100, Piotr Roszatycki wrote:
> > I think your linux-modules-contrib package generates bad version
> > number for rt73-modules.
> > The version number for module package should be the version of
> > rt73-source package, i.e.
> > 1:1.0.3.6-cvs20071123-dfsg1-2.
>
> Please explain what you think is wrong.

Sorry.

Nothing is wrong and I simply didn't noticed that this package is
correct metapackage.

I'm closing this wrong bugreport.

-- 
 .''`.    Piotr Roszatycki
: :' :    mailto:Piotr.Roszatycki@gmail.com
`. `'     mailto:dexter@debian.org
  `-


--- End Message ---

Reply to: