Bug#450755: marked as done (gconfig)
Your message dated Tue, 18 Dec 2007 18:28:33 +0100
with message-id <20071218172833.GA4836@stro.at>
and subject line Bug#450755: gconfig
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message ---
Package: linux-source-2.6.22
Version: 2.6.22-4
Severity: wishlist
--- Please enter the report below this line. ---
What is responsible in "make gconfig" for gconfig? Some package? In the Info windo
It would be helpfull if there would be possibility to open the trees with right arrow key and to
close with left arrow key.
--- System information. ---
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux 2.6.22-2-686
Debian Release: lenny/sid
600 testing www.debian-multimedia.org
600 testing gd.tuwien.ac.at
500 unstable gd.tuwien.ac.at
400 stable security.debian.org
--- Package information. ---
Depends (Version) | Installed
=======================-+-===========
binutils | 2.18-1
bzip2 | 1.0.3-7
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Marek Straka <marek@straka.info>
- Subject: Re: Bug#450755: gconfig
- From: maximilian attems <max@stro.at>
- Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2007 18:28:33 +0100
- Message-id: <20071218172833.GA4836@stro.at>
- In-reply-to: <4734FC66.6050802@straka.info>
- References: <4734F3CD.407@straka.info> <20071110001250.GY14432@baikonur.stro.at> <4734FC66.6050802@straka.info>
On Sat, 10 Nov 2007, Marek Straka wrote:
> Hm - was für ein "upstream" meinst du damit? woher kommt das "gconfig"?
>
> Marek
kernel upstream, make gconfig needs good gtk hackers.
so either report your feature requests on bugzilla.kernel.org or
on lkml.
closing as not the place, we won't accept gconfig patches deviating
from upstream.
--
maks
--- End Message ---
Reply to: