On Sun, Dec 16, 2007 at 12:06:52PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote: > > It is caused by 2.6.23.10. Reason still unknown. > The best candidate is 89bdb3683f1fcc65e3ac150995f3c11c5e6e9ba6, it > changes "struct restart_block", which is part of "struct k_clock", which > is used as parameter to register_posix_clock. I believe someone will kill me for that. The contents of the struct, except the function pointer, are never read outside of the given function. Therefor it should not produce problems if we ignore the changes for the symbol version. Bastian -- "Get back to your stations!" "We're beaming down to the planet, sir." -- Kirk and Mr. Leslie, "This Side of Paradise", stardate 3417.3
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature