[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#405232: marked as done (include rt2400/rt2500/rt2570/rt2x00)

Your message dated Mon, 26 Nov 2007 14:47:47 +0100
with message-id <474ACE83.2060208@debian.org>
and subject line include rt2400/rt2500/rt2570/rt2x00
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: linux-modules-contrib-2.6
Severity: wishlist

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Would it be possible to include module packages built from the
rt2400-source and rt2500-source packages?

- -- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (530, 'testing'), (520, 'unstable'), (510, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-3-k7
Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFFma1sshl/216gEHgRAtxQAJ9+YxZ6Pj80WK9thz80aIOc77trWwCgnhB2
blvYhCsyQ8wM0YYeCq16xtY=
=zrX2
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
I've removed the definition files for rt2400/rt2500 again. However, if
something doesn't work out with 2.6.24, please reopen the bug. No big
deal to re-add the files again.

-- 
Address:        Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist
Email:          daniel.baumann@panthera-systems.net
Internet:       http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/

--- End Message ---
Reply to: