[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#446323: mdadm: recovery in infinite loop



On 10/12/07, Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de> wrote:
> On Friday October 12, szybalski@gmail.com wrote:
> > yes I have.
> > Then I tried booting in knoppix to see if maybe there are hdd problems
> > so I run e2fsck on both drives to see if there are any issues.
> > reboot and it still does the same thing.
>
> Ok, it must be caused by some persistent state.
> Could you send
>   mdadm -E /dev/hda2
/dev/hda2:
          Magic : a92b4efc
        Version : 00.90.00
           UUID : 6934dbf9:dfe9d7d1:b1274a75:6a339511 (local to host hplinux)
  Creation Time : Mon Oct  8 16:52:03 2007
     Raid Level : raid1
    Device Size : 276438400 (263.63 GiB 283.07 GB)
     Array Size : 276438400 (263.63 GiB 283.07 GB)
   Raid Devices : 2
  Total Devices : 2
Preferred Minor : 2

    Update Time : Mon Oct 15 18:20:08 2007
          State : clean
 Active Devices : 1
Working Devices : 2
 Failed Devices : 0
  Spare Devices : 1
       Checksum : ac3dd397 - correct
         Events : 0.7016


      Number   Major   Minor   RaidDevice State
this     2       3        2        2      spare   /dev/hda2

   0     0       0        0        0      removed
   1     1       3       66        1      active sync   /dev/hdb2
   2     2       3        2        2      spare   /dev/hda2

>   mdadm -E /dev/hdb2

/dev/hdb2:
          Magic : a92b4efc
        Version : 00.90.00
           UUID : 6934dbf9:dfe9d7d1:b1274a75:6a339511 (local to host hplinux)
  Creation Time : Mon Oct  8 16:52:03 2007
     Raid Level : raid1
    Device Size : 276438400 (263.63 GiB 283.07 GB)
     Array Size : 276438400 (263.63 GiB 283.07 GB)
   Raid Devices : 2
  Total Devices : 2
Preferred Minor : 2

    Update Time : Mon Oct 15 18:20:08 2007
          State : clean
 Active Devices : 1
Working Devices : 2
 Failed Devices : 0
  Spare Devices : 1
       Checksum : ac3dd3db - correct
         Events : 0.7016


      Number   Major   Minor   RaidDevice State
this     1       3       66        1      active sync   /dev/hdb2

   0     0       0        0        0      removed
   1     1       3       66        1      active sync   /dev/hdb2
   2     2       3        2        2      spare   /dev/hda2

seems as the size is the same?
any ideas?

lucas




Reply to: