Re: error in linux-headers-2.6.23-rc2-*

[nobert <norbert.breun@oracle.com>]

Hi maks,

you lucky one. 

I don't see this as feature. My opinion is: this is a matter of bad
behavior.
Providing packages that have unresolved / unresolvable dependencies is some
kind of terrorism to the users. And it is stupid at all.

Cheers



maximilian attems-9 wrote:
> 
> hello norbert,
> 
> On Mon, Aug 06, 2007 at 09:14:56PM +0200, Norbert Breun wrote:
>> 
>> isn't it funny:
>> 
>>     linux-headers-2.6.23-rc2-all:
>>      Depends: linux-headers-2.6.23-rc2-all-i386 but it is not going to
>>     be installed
>> 
>> it depends on itself...
>> 
>> 
>> Even linux-kbuild-2.6.23 is not there so I get this too:
>> 
>>     linux-headers-2.6.23-rc2-k7:
>>      Depends: linux-kbuild-2.6.23  but it is not installable
>> 
>> 
>> just to keep you informed...
> 
> yes that is a known "feature" of the daily rcX buildserver builds,
> they are not very friendly to out of tree modules.
> 
> i'm happy enough to have the kernel itself tested.
>  
> regards
> 
> -- 
> maks
> 
> 
> -- 
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
> listmaster@lists.debian.org
> 
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/error-in-linux-headers-2.6.23-rc2-*-tf4226268.html#a12952557
Sent from the debian-kernel mailing list archive at Nabble.com.