Re: linux-kbuild-2.6_2.6.22-1~bpo40+1_amd64.changes is NEW

To: "Backports.org archive Installer" <installer@backports.org>, Norbert Tretkowski <norbert@tretkowski.de>, Debian Kernel Team <debian-kernel@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: linux-kbuild-2.6_2.6.22-1~bpo40+1_amd64.changes is NEW
From: maximilian attems <max@stro.at>
Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 10:01:05 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 20070921080105.GX19918@baikonur.stro.at>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20070921074429.GA11514@wavehammer.waldi.eu.org>
References: <[🔎] 20070921060206.E9D0A33800D@www.backports.org> <[🔎] 20070921074429.GA11514@wavehammer.waldi.eu.org>

On Fri, Sep 21, 2007 at 09:44:29AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> Stop that. debian-kernel is not the maintainer of the backports.
> 
> Bastian

why?

it pretty much seems logical.

btw happy to see 22 there, as i'm not sooo fond of 21.

-- 
maks

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: linux-kbuild-2.6_2.6.22-1~bpo40+1_amd64.changes is NEW
  - From: Bastian Blank <waldi@debian.org>

References:
- linux-kbuild-2.6_2.6.22-1~bpo40+1_amd64.changes is NEW
  - From: Backports.org archive Installer <installer@backports.org>
- Re: linux-kbuild-2.6_2.6.22-1~bpo40+1_amd64.changes is NEW
  - From: Bastian Blank <waldi@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Bug#443407: linux-image-2.6.22-2-686: kernel BUG at kernel/power/snapshot.c:464! on Thinkpad T60 resume
Next by Date: Bug#311357: for foraker foraminifera
Previous by thread: Re: linux-kbuild-2.6_2.6.22-1~bpo40+1_amd64.changes is NEW
Next by thread: Re: linux-kbuild-2.6_2.6.22-1~bpo40+1_amd64.changes is NEW
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread