Bug#436166: [Pkg-lirc-maint] Bug#436166: Progress notes
reassign 436166 lirc
stop
On Sat, Aug 11, 2007, Stephen Gran wrote:
> bttv.h is a 'private' header, and not included in the kernel headers
> shipped in Debian. This is why there is an attempt at versioned bttv.h
> headers in lirc itself. It's a bad hack, but I'm not sure what else can
> be done.
Ok, thanks for the explanations. I guess there are different ways to
handle this issue:
1) make the header public and ship it in the kernel headers; not sure
this is likely to happen, no idea of the policy for such stuff
2) ship the header in lirc; doesn't sound like a good idea
3) document that you need a full kernel tree -- and not just kernel
headers -- to build the lirc modules; wouldn't help our users that much
I'm afraid
4) 3 + automatically select the modules that can be built
I think it would be best to prepare the newest upstream release first,
and see what upstream recommends on this matter.
I was happy to cleanup the packaging of lirc, but I can't really
prepare an upstream myself as I don't own any lirc-supported hardware;
I hope another person of the lirc team can prepare the new upstream
release and test it until we revisit this issue.
--
Loïc Minier
Reply to: