[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#365625: marked as done (linux-image-2.6.16-1-686: The raw1394 module seems to be broken)

Your message dated Sun, 5 Aug 2007 01:29:51 +0200
with message-id <20070804232951.GA28945@stro.at>
and subject line linux-image-2.6.16-1-686: The raw1394 module seems to be broken
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: linux-image-2.6.16-1-686
Version: 2.6.16-10
Severity: normal

A module format error is thrown when trying to load the raw1394 module.
This only seems to be problem in the 686 (have not check all archs though)
% sudo modprobe raw1394
FATAL: Error inserting raw1394 (/lib/modules/2.6.16-1-686/kernel/drivers/ieee1394/raw1394.ko): 
  Invalid module format


-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (101, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.16-1-686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=nl_NL.UTF8@euro (charmap=UTF-8)

Versions of packages linux-image-2.6.16-1-686 depends on:
ii  module-init-tools             3.2.2-2    tools for managing Linux kernel mo
ii  yaird [linux-initramfs-tool]  0.0.12-9   Yet Another mkInitRD

Versions of packages linux-image-2.6.16-1-686 recommends:
ii  libc6-i686                    2.3.6-7    GNU C Library: Shared libraries [i

-- debconf information excluded

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.16-1

abi got fixed back in those days,
thus closing.


--- End Message ---

Reply to: