Bug#392015: closed by maximilian attems <max@stro.at> (Re: Request for openvz patched binary kernels.)
Hi
I understand. However openvz have several advantages over vserver as
it support live migration.
I can see that the Xen version of the kernel has been removed with
recent images. Is that one already included upstream?
Regards,
// Ola
On Sun, Jul 29, 2007 at 11:18:03AM +0000, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report
> #392015: Request for openvz patched binary kernels.,
> which was filed against the linux-2.6 package.
>
> It has been closed by maximilian attems <max@stro.at>.
>
> Their explanation is attached below. If this explanation is
> unsatisfactory and you have not received a better one in a separate
> message then please contact maximilian attems <max@stro.at> by replying
> to this email.
>
> Debian bug tracking system administrator
> (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
>
> From: maximilian attems <max@stro.at>
> To: 392015-done@bugs.debian.org
> Subject: Re: Request for openvz patched binary kernels.
> X-Virus-Scanned: by Amavis (ClamAV) at stro.at
> X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
> (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on rietz.debian.org
> X-Spam-Level:
> X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
> version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
>
> the kernel team is already serving prebuild vserver patches.
> the feature list of openvz and vserver seems quite similar
> i thus fail to see a compelling arg to have more flavours to
> take care of. push it upstream with the container patches.
> see also
> -> http://wiki.debian.org/DebianKernelPatchAcceptanceGuidelines
>
> closing in this round of kernel bug cleanup.
>
> --
> maks
--
--------------------- Ola Lundqvist ---------------------------
/ opal@debian.org Annebergsslingan 37 \
| ola@opalsys.net 654 65 KARLSTAD |
| http://opalsys.net/ +46 (0)70-332 1551 |
\ gpg/f.p.: 7090 A92B 18FE 7994 0C36 4FE4 18A1 B1CF 0FE5 3DD9 /
---------------------------------------------------------------
Reply to: