Your message dated Tue, 19 Jun 2007 10:32:10 +0200 with message-id <20070619083210.GP21956@baikonur.stro.at> and subject line Bug#429622: AMD/ATI SB700 support to Debian has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message ---
- To: <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Cc: "Henry Su" <henry.su@amd.com>, "Shane Huang" <shane.huang@amd.com>
- Subject: AMD/ATI SB700 support to Debian
- From: "Shane Huang" <shane.huang@amd.com>
- Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 15:41:12 +0800
- Message-id: <[🔎] FFECF24D2A7F6D418B9511AF6F35860201D06F28@shacnexch2.atitech.com>
Package: kernel Version: older than 2.6.22 We have four patches for AMD/ATI SB700, and we will full support SB700 until 2.6.23-rc1. The four patches have been accepted by kernel org and the applied kernel version are listed as following: 1.SMBus device ID 2.6.23-rc1 2.IDE device ID 2.6.22 3.SATA device ID 2.6.22 4.Combined mode 2.6.22 Because the patch for SMBus device ID is sent after the merge window for 2.6.22, and as a result it is queued for the next kernel version: 2.6.23. it will be merged in Linus' tree between 2.6.22 (final) and 2.6.23-rc1. My request here is: Which kernel version will be adopted in the next Debian(4.1?) release? If it will use the linux kernel AFTER 2.6.22, then that's good and please discard the rest part of this mail. Otherwise if it use the kernel older than 2.6.22, please apply the attached four patches into it manually. Thanks Best Regards ShaneAttachment: SMBus.patch
Description: SMBus.patchAttachment: combinedmode.patch
Description: combinedmode.patchAttachment: ide.patch
Description: ide.patchAttachment: sata.patch
Description: sata.patch
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Shane Huang <shane.huang@amd.com>, 429622-done@bugs.debian.org
- Cc: Henry Su <henry.su@amd.com>
- Subject: Re: Bug#429622: AMD/ATI SB700 support to Debian
- From: maximilian attems <max@stro.at>
- Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 10:32:10 +0200
- Message-id: <20070619083210.GP21956@baikonur.stro.at>
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] FFECF24D2A7F6D418B9511AF6F35860201D06F28@shacnexch2.atitech.com>
- References: <[🔎] FFECF24D2A7F6D418B9511AF6F35860201D06F28@shacnexch2.atitech.com>
hello shane, On Tue, Jun 19, 2007 at 03:41:12PM +0800, Shane Huang wrote: > Package: kernel > Version: older than 2.6.22 hehe not sure if the versioning tracking recognizes that :) > We have four patches for AMD/ATI SB700, and we will full support SB700 > until 2.6.23-rc1. The four patches have been accepted by kernel org and > the applied kernel version are listed as following: > 1.SMBus device ID 2.6.23-rc1 > 2.IDE device ID 2.6.22 > 3.SATA device ID 2.6.22 > 4.Combined mode 2.6.22 > > Because the patch for SMBus device ID is sent after the merge window > for 2.6.22, and as a result it is queued for the next kernel version: > 2.6.23. it will be merged in Linus' tree between 2.6.22 (final) and > 2.6.23-rc1. ok, nice. > My request here is: > Which kernel version will be adopted in the next Debian(4.1?) release? > If it will use the linux kernel AFTER 2.6.22, then that's good and > please discard the rest part of this mail. > Otherwise if it use the kernel older than 2.6.22, please apply the > attached four patches into it manually. nitpicking please ask such questions on the mailing list see -> http://wiki.debian.org/DebianKernel seems more appropriate than a bug. :) anyway the final shipped version is not decided yet but will not be frozen before next spring/summer so qualifies for > 2.6.22 thus closing the bug. best regards -- maks
--- End Message ---