Re: RFC: initramfs-tools postinst causes system inconsistency?
[ again wrong ml on cc ]
On Wed, 16 May 2007, Tim Dijkstra wrote:
> On Tue, 15 May 2007 23:54:02 +0200
> maximilian attems <max@stro.at> wrote:
>
> > i'd appreciate if you post such questions to the corresponding
> > development mailing list which is debian-kernel for initramfs
> > questions.
> > thanks
> >
> > > Current pratice is to only call `update-initramfs -u', that is, to only
> > > update the most recent initramfs. This however will break older
> > > initramfses (I have had bugreports). Now I plan to switch to running
> > > with '-k all' (all initramfses), but this of course will also
> > > influence=20 the packages that ran with '-u' only.
> >
> > afaik uswsusp does not support full > 2.6.15 range,
> > so better stay on the safe side.
>
> Uswsusp will refuse to suspend or resume with kernels it won't support, so that's OK.
>
> grts Tim
ok great.
anyway you want to search d-kernel archive for that discussion.
short summary: stay on the safe side.
--
maks
Reply to: