[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Preparing 2.6.18.dfsg.1-13



On Mon, Apr 09, 2007 at 04:48:29PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 08, 2007 at 01:38:31PM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> > Sure, I can handle them.
> 
> Okay.
> 
> You want to use the -XetchY namespace for security builds and the -X for
> p-u uploads? The first is no problem, but the later is if we don't
> update linux-2.6 in testing ASAP.

That was my default plan, but I can use -XetchY in the meantime for
both since they need to be ordered anyway.

> > Rebuild on every linux-2.6 update
> > ---------------------------------
> > fai-kernels
> > user-mode-linux
> 
> BinNMUs at least for fai-kernels will work.

Ah, good point. 

> > Rebuild on ABI changes
> > ----------------------
> > linux-latest-2.6
> > linux-modules-contrib-2.6
> > linux-modules-extra-2.6
> > linux-modules-nonfree-2.6
> > loop-aes
> > nvidia-kernel-legacy-2.6.18-4-amd64
> 
> Hmm?

What's your question?

> > Does this need rebuilding?
> > --------------------------
> > firmware-nonfree
> 
> No. Except that the build dependencies will go away.

A FTBFS is certainly a regression, so I suppose this should be on the
ABI change list?

-- 
dann frazier



Reply to: