Re: Preparing 2.6.18.dfsg.1-13
On Mon, Apr 09, 2007 at 04:48:29PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 08, 2007 at 01:38:31PM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> > Sure, I can handle them.
>
> Okay.
>
> You want to use the -XetchY namespace for security builds and the -X for
> p-u uploads? The first is no problem, but the later is if we don't
> update linux-2.6 in testing ASAP.
That was my default plan, but I can use -XetchY in the meantime for
both since they need to be ordered anyway.
> > Rebuild on every linux-2.6 update
> > ---------------------------------
> > fai-kernels
> > user-mode-linux
>
> BinNMUs at least for fai-kernels will work.
Ah, good point.
> > Rebuild on ABI changes
> > ----------------------
> > linux-latest-2.6
> > linux-modules-contrib-2.6
> > linux-modules-extra-2.6
> > linux-modules-nonfree-2.6
> > loop-aes
> > nvidia-kernel-legacy-2.6.18-4-amd64
>
> Hmm?
What's your question?
> > Does this need rebuilding?
> > --------------------------
> > firmware-nonfree
>
> No. Except that the build dependencies will go away.
A FTBFS is certainly a regression, so I suppose this should be on the
ABI change list?
--
dann frazier
Reply to: