Re: 2.6.21-rc5
Frederik Schueler <fs@debian.org> writes:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, Mar 31, 2007 at 07:22:38PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
>> any voices against basing trunk on latest upstream?
>> have an i386 working tree to commit.
>>
>> should 2.6.20 first be copied to sid?
>
> IMHO we should upload 2.6.20.4 to unstable, and 2.6.21-rc to
> experimental.
I like this option. That would bring the best of both worlds to the
unstable users :-)
--
O T A V I O S A L V A D O R
---------------------------------------------
E-mail: otavio@debian.org UIN: 5906116
GNU/Linux User: 239058 GPG ID: 49A5F855
Home Page: http://otavio.ossystems.com.br
---------------------------------------------
"Microsoft sells you Windows ... Linux gives
you the whole house."
Reply to: