Re: Planning kernel updates in etch
On Tue, Mar 13, 2007 at 10:39:34AM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> I propose that we continue using usertags for this purpose, but only
> two of them - one for security, and one for non-security.
> We can use the 'pending' tag to differentiate between issues that are
> fixed in svn and those that are not yet fixed (pending flag is added
> automatically by a post-commit hook anyway).
>
> My suggestion is simply 'dkt-etch-update' and
> 'dkt-etch-security-update'. Neither imply the status of the bug, which
> I think is sufficiently handled by other tags.
Actually, I'd like to modify this proposal and suggest that we only
use dkt-etch-update. Security bugs should have the 'security' tag, so
the extra usertag is redundant as well.
--
dann frazier
Reply to: