dann frazier <email@example.com> writes:
> On Fri, Feb 09, 2007 at 10:47:58PM -0800, Jurij Smakov wrote:
>> I believe the original idea was to create d-k-m for discussions and
>> keep d-k as the address in maintainer field (and the primary contact
>> address for the user requests). This appears to be the most
>> straightforward way, as it requires no changes.
> That seems inherently conflicting because external people are
> most likely to start discussions on the maintainer address.
And wouldn't every user have to subscribe to the other list?