[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#400220: linux-modules-extra-2.6: source package does not compile due to missing build dependencies (squafs/unionfs)



On Fri, Nov 24, 2006 at 03:11:16PM +0100, Frederik Wagner wrote:
> Package: linux-modules-extra-2.6
> Version: 2.6.17-2
> Severity: serious
> Justification: no longer builds from source

> The source package depends on the 'squashfs-source' and 'unionfs-source'
> package, which are not available in etch.

> Looking at packages.debian.org: 'squashfs-source' is only available in
> unstable and 'unionfs-source' only in stable and unstable, but _not_
> testing!

> As far as I remember, by removing all the relevant rules for building
> the unionfs/squasfs related modules-packages, the
> 'redhat-cluster-modules' and 'spca5xx-modules' are building fine (at
> least on amd64).

So here's the score:

unionfs and squashfs were both removed from testing due to release-critical
bugs.  The bugs in both packages have been fixed, so they should be able to
get back into testing again.

Both packages are out-of-date on arm because the module metapackages they
previously generated are now built *by* linux-modules-extra-2.6, and
l-m-e-2.6 has not yet built successfully on arm.

Previously, l-m-e-2.6 didn't build on arm because of an internal consistency
failure when compiling squashfs.

Now, it's impossible to check whether this bug is still present on arm,
because l-m-e-2.6 now has an unsatisfiable build-dependency in unstable on
linux-support-2.6.18-1.

So l-m-e-2.6 needs to be uploaded with a fixed build-dependency before we
can even *try* to see whether squashfs needs further fixes on arm for etch.

-- 
Steve Langasek                   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer                   to set it on, and I can move the world.
vorlon@debian.org                                   http://www.debian.org/



Reply to: