[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#368043: marked as done (initramfs-tools: postinstall script can require /usr/share/doc/)



Your message dated Thu, 22 Jun 2006 23:31:40 +0200
with message-id <20060622213139.GA9903@nancy>
and subject line initramfs-tools: postinstall script can require /usr/share/doc/
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: initramfs-tools
Version: 0.60
Severity: important
Justification: Packages must not require the existance of any files in
 /usr/share/doc in order to function.
 http://release.debian.org/etch_rc_policy.txt

The postinstall script does:

|if [ ! -e /etc/mkinitramfs/modules ]; then
|        cp /usr/share/doc/initramfs-tools/examples/modules /etc/mkinitramfs/
|fi

This code gets called on a dpkg-reconfigure, and can fail if the admin
has removed /etc/mkinitramfs/modules:

|$ sudo dpkg-reconfigure initramfs-tools
|cp: cannot stat `/usr/share/doc/initramfs-tools/examples/modules': No such file or directory


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 0.64

fixed in latest upload, pasting the relavant changelog:

initramfs-tools (0.64) unstable; urgency=low

  RELEASE o bella, ciao! bella, ciao!

  * debian/initramfs-tools.install: Add /etc/initramfs-tools/modules conffile,
    instead of a cp from postinstall. (closes: #368043)

  * debian/control, update-initramfs.8, mkinitramfs.8: Capitalize RAM + NFS.
    Rephrase nfs root support.

    Thanks to Jeff Bailey <jbailey@raspberryginger.com> and
    Steinar H. Gunderson <sesse@debian.org> for the review.


thanks for your report.

-- 
maks

--- End Message ---

Reply to: