Your message dated Fri, 2 Jun 2006 18:52:25 +0200 with message-id <20060602165225.GA23113@wonderland.linux.it> and subject line Bug#349354: initramfs-tools - kernel -udev dependency loop has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message ---
- To: submit@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: initramfs-tools - kernel -udev dependency loop
- From: "Nikita V. Youshchenko" <yoush@debian.org>
- Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2006 17:27:43 +0300
- Message-id: <200601221727.50771@sercond.localdomain>
Package: initramfs-tools,kernel,udev Currently: - recent linux-image packages depend on 'initramfs-tools | yaird | linux-initramfs-tool', so initramfs-tools is the 'default' alternative - initramfs-tools depends on recent udev - recent udev refuses to install unless recent kernel is running This loop needs to be broken somehow.Attachment: pgp_wtZMvRjbx.pgp
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: maximilian attems <maks@sternwelten.at>, 349354-done@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Bug#349354: initramfs-tools - kernel -udev dependency loop
- From: md@Linux.IT (Marco d'Itri)
- Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2006 18:52:25 +0200
- Message-id: <20060602165225.GA23113@wonderland.linux.it>
- In-reply-to: <20060526205135.GA1359@wonderland.linux.it>
- References: <20060511202603.GB20309@nancy> <20060511220237.GA20229@wonderland.linux.it> <20060511221818.GC3135@baikonur.stro.at> <20060511233557.GB21147@wonderland.linux.it> <20060515072724.GA24023@nancy> <20060515075425.GD4068@wonderland.linux.it> <20060524161403.GA29605@wonderland.linux.it> <20060525001120.GA7739@nancy> <20060525072743.GB4060@wonderland.linux.it> <20060526205135.GA1359@wonderland.linux.it>
On May 26, Marco d'Itri <md@Linux.IT> wrote: > Any more bright ideas? Tought so. I'm closing this bug, since now we have #369479 which is correctly tracking the UI improvement request. -- ciao, MarcoAttachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---