On May 25, maximilian attems <maks@sternwelten.at> wrote: > > > These packages are not actually needed by udev, and again they may be > > > unpacked in the wrong order. Next? > i know that these packages are not needed by udev itself, > they are going to be installed on an upgrade to a new linux-image So what? udev still needs to check that they have been installed before it can continue. > udev disables itself for 2.4 kernels, why can't it do that for 2.6.8? It does, but people do not expect that an udev upgrade will disable it, and they are right. > otherwise stick that super special config in one of the package you depend > on aka initscripts or makedev or lsb-base.. I do not know what you are writing about. -- ciao, Marco
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature